“For Whom He Foreknew”–Romans 8:29

A proper understanding of the Bible’s teaching about “foreknowledge” is essential to an understanding of God’s predestined plan or purpose. The way in which we view this issue will determine how we understand the biblical doctrines of election and predestination. If we rightly understand the biblical doctrine of human depravity or inability, the idea this verse teaches that “foreseen faith” forms the basis of God’s choice of certain individuals for salvation is out of the question. That is to say, if we believe in the innate inability of an unregenerate person to seek God, the idea of God foreseeing a faith that is produced out of depraved nature, a faith that could not exist apart from divine intervention, is unthinkable. We have learned that the divine call produces faith and that the call is according to God’s eternal purpose, plan, counsel which was formed before time began. The order is, God’s purpose produces the call [God calls people because he has purposed to call them] and the call produces faith. In the scheme of those who believe in “free will” and not in “free grace,” what God purposes is determined by what he foresees will happen, and the call is unnecessary since the issue is determined by the sinner’s free will decision and not by God’s free grace. What is certain is that a sinner’s faith cannot be, at the same time, the determining factor in what God decides and the result of what God has decided.

Three Ways of Understanding “Foreknew”

We can think of the idea of foreknowledge in three ways. First, we can think of foreknowledge simply in terms of God’s omniscience of all things future. To my knowledge, the word is never used in this sense in the Bible though the idea that God knows all things future is clearly there. There is nothing “future” to God. God knows what will occur before it occurs. He dwells in eternity and sees every event as present. Isaiah 46: 10 informs us he “declares the end from the beginning and from ancient times things that are not yet done.” He knows about everything that is going to happen before it happens and he knows what his creatures will do before we do it. He knows about all his creatures and all their actions. In this sense, God foreknows everyone. Keep that thought in mind because it will become very important when we discuss the meaning of “foreknew” in Romans 8:29. The question is, does God determine what is going to happen because he foresees it, or visa versa? I believe the answer is he foresees what he has determined or purposed.

That brings us to the second sense in which “foreknowledge” is used. It is knowledge beforehand based on a divine decree. Jesus was handed over by the “determinate counsel and foreknowledge of God” (see Acts 2:23). Notice the order in which Peter mentions counsel or purpose and foreknowledge. It is not simply that God sees ahead of time what is going to happen and decides to go with it. We have already learned that God is actively involved in governing all his creatures and all their actions according to his purpose. The idea that God merely foresees what is going to happen and decides to “rubber stamp”it is foreign to the teaching of the Bible. The issue, then, is not whether God foresees the believer’s faith and final perseverance, but whether his foresight of that faith and perseverance is the reason he decided to choose them.

Third, we can think of foreknowledge as an intimate, loving, approval of people beforehand.

What Does “Foreknew” Mean in Romans 8:29?

What does the Text Actually Say?

If we simply read the plain text of Romans 8:29, do we find the words “Those in whom God foresaw faith?” Of course, unless you are reading from a paraphrase of the biblical text and not the text itself, you will not find these words. The text says absolutely nothing about God foreseeing anyone’s faith or perseverance. The text teaches that God foreknows people. Paul does not write about what he foreknew but about whom he foreknew.

God “Foresees” Everyone’s Actions and Responses

Let us assume for the moment the text actually reads “‘For whom God foresaw’ or ‘ For those whose actions and decisions God foresaw,’ he also predestinated to be conformed to the image of his Son.” What would that mean? Since God has foreseen all events and all actions of all people, and since the text indicates nothing that limits what God foresaw, it would make Paul mean that God has predestined everyone without exception to be conformed to Christ’s image. God foresaw not only the actions and responses of those who will at some point believe the gospel; he foresaw everyone’s actions and responses. Even understanding that God’s knowledge extends to an intimate, penetrating, extensive acquaintance with every person’s inmost being and personality does not alleviate the problem. He knows everyone in this way. Unless we believe God has predestined everyone to be conformed to the image of Christ, we cannot consistently believe Paul is merely speaking about God’s extensive knowledge of all people, future events and future actions.

What Does God Foresee About All Sinners?

If God’s decree to save some ( i.e., restore his image in them and bring them to glory) and pass over others was based on what sinners will invariably do when confronted with the gospel, he would have decreed to pass over everyone. As we have shown, [foreseen] faith cannot be both the basis or cause and the effect of God’s decision to save. God cannot decree to save people based on his foresight of a faith that would never exist if he had not purposed to bring it about. Do passages like Psalm 14:1-3 say anything about God seeing some who would be willing to understand the things of God and seek a loving, believing, obedient and worshipful relationship with him? Of course, the answer is that God sees exactly the opposite. God sees that no one will seek such a relationship apart from his enabling grace. Nothing short of God’s inward call and his regenerating grace will cause sinners to seek after him.

The Importance of Context

Let us assume again that Paul intends us to understand that God has predestined to conform some people to Christ’s image based on his foresight of their persevering faith. How would that idea fit into the context of Paul’s argument in this passage?

The main point Paul continues to make in these verses is that if God has justified a person, he is certain to glorify that person. He has adduced argument after argument in support of that proposition. His argument in these verses is that the believer’s glorification is certain because the entire work of salvation, the work of bringing his chosen people to glory, is God’s work in fulfillment of his eternal, electing decree. That work has been likened to a chain that is anchored in eternity past and extends to the end of time. Every link in that chain represents some aspect of God’s work. It began with his sovereign purpose to redeem a people marked out for himself. He loved these chosen people before they ever had being and determined beforehand that he would conform them to the image of his Son. Then, according to that divine determination, he calls them out of the world, effectually uniting them to his Son. Since they are in union with Christ, he declares them righteous in his sight. Additionally, he guarantees their glorification because they are in him who has already entered into his glory.

Everything in these verses concerns God’s work of bringing his chosen people to glory. Paul does not even mention God’s work of sanctification. I would presume he omits any reference to that work because, unlike justification, it brings within its scope the believer’s works of obedience which, in this life, will never be perfect. God has promised that he will ultimately bring the believer to complete and perfect holiness, but that work is anything but complete in the present.

The point is these verses are about what God does, not what believers do. It would be completely incongruous to introduce the believer’s faith into this context. God does not love sinners because he foresees we are going to love him. We love him because he first loved us.

Use of the Words “Know” and “Foreknow” in the Scriptures

The Greek verb translated “foreknew” is the aorist tense (point action, usually past tense) form of the verb proginōskō. It is a compound verb made up of the words pro-before and ginōskō to know by experience, to regard with love, approve. The word ginōskō is used to translate the Hebrew (yada) in the LXX, the Greek translation of the Hebrew O.T. Consider a few examples of this word’s usage in the Old and New Testament Scriptures.

Genesis 4:1 “Now Adam knew his wife Eve, and she conceived and bore Cain. . . .”

Psalm 1:6 “The LORD knows the way of the righteous, but the way of the ungodly shall perish.”

Amos 3:2 “You only have I known of all the families of the earth; therefore I will punish you for all your iniquities.”

Nahum 1:7 “The LORD is good, a stronghold in the day of trouble; he knows those who take refuge in him.”

Matthew 1:24-25 “. . .he took his wife, but knew her not until she had given birth to a son. . . .”

Matthew 7:23 “And then will I declare to them, ‘I never knew you; depart from me, you workers of iniquity.”

John 10:14 “I am the good shepherd. I know my own and my own know me,”

2 Timothy 2:19 “ The Lord knows those that are his. . . .”

It is obvious this word is used of a knowledge that goes beyond awareness of facts about a person. Instead, it is used to express intimacy and approval. It carries with it the meaning “to regard with love.”

Consider also the use of the word proginōskō in the New Testament Scriptures:

“God has not rejected his people whom he foreknew” (Romans 11:2a).

Peter, an apostle of Jesus Christ, To those who are elect exiles of the Dispersion in Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Bithynia, according to the foreknowledge of God the Father, in the sanctification of the Spirit, for obedience to Jesus Christ and for sprinkling with his blood: May grace and peace be multiplied to you (1 Peter 1:1-2).

Notice the text reads “according to the foreknowledge of God,” not “based on the foreknowledge of God.” These people were not scattered abroad because God foresaw it would happen.

“He [Jesus] was foreknown before the foundation of the world but was made manifest in the last times for the sake of you (1Pet. 1:20).

In these verses, it is the people who were foreknown, not their actions.


What should we conclude about the idea Paul meant to convey in Romans 8:29? When we consider the actual words of the text without reading our own ideas into them, the context in which they are written, and the usage of the word in the rest of Scripture, there is only one conclusion we can reach. The word means to regard with loving approval beforehand. Paul could have well written,“For whom God loved before hand, he also predestinated. . . .” God’s choice of sinners to be conformed to his Son’s image was not a cold and arbitrary decree, but was according to his great love with which he loved us, even when we were dead in trespasses(see Eph. 2:4-5).

Questions for Study

1. In what three ways can we understand the words “foreknew” and “foreknowledge?”

2. What does Romans 8:29 say about God foreseeing faith?

3. Why is the word “whom” important in verse 29?

4. Since God foreknows everyone in the sense that he knows altogether about them and knows everything they will do or choose, could Paul have been using the term in the sense of foresight of future actions in Romans 8:29? If not, why not?

5. How does what God actually sees about sinners in a state of sinful nature (Psa. 14 for example) affect the question of foreseen faith as the basis of God’s saving decree?

6. How does the context of Paul’s main argument in this section affect this question?

7. What ideas are expressed by the word ginōskō in the Bible?

8. What do we learn by considering the of the use of proginōskō in the New Testament Scriptures?

9. As it is used in the New Testament Scriptures, does proginōskō refer to a knowledge of people or of their actions and decisions?

10. How could we legitimately translate Romans 8:29?


10 Responses to ““For Whom He Foreknew”–Romans 8:29”

  1. November 13, 2013 at 12:02 pm

    Good explanation of a weighty topic!

    • November 13, 2013 at 12:56 pm

      Thank you my Brother. I think that on this doctrine and on the biblical doctrine of sin hinges our entire view of salvation. If God has based his plan on his foresight that sinners will either by the power of sinful nature or by the “enabling” of a preceding grace that fails actually to bring all those to whom it is given to saving faith, nothing else we believe makes any sense. If such a thing were true, we certainly would have no need of God’s internal call or of regenerating grace.

  2. December 20, 2013 at 10:06 pm

    After the New Years, one of church Bible Study asked me to go over and explain what foreknowledge means Biblically and many in this particular small group are new or unfamiliar with the doctrine of Grace so this post got me thinking a little more about foreknowledge. Thanks

  3. November 7, 2016 at 11:32 pm

    God commands all to repent acts 17:30
    There is nothing wrong with god foreknowing something without choosing it.
    He can do both god can know something and passively allow it too happen.
    That would not defeat the purpose of grace. Since god offers grace to everyone Romans 6:23.

    Predestination = god knows something and chooses it. He chooses a date as well(active)

    Foreknowledge=god knows something but just passively allows it too happen.

    The former means god is active in it
    The latter means god is passive in it.

    If your saying god is active in all our choices then u make him the author of sin.

    Him passively allowing something would not make him a helpless ant who is just begging something to come to pass

    It could be said that god knows that some people will use there talents and others will not use them.

    But does god predestined who will
    And won’t NO!!!!!!

    Since god wants everyone to use there talents. Yet he knows some won’t it doesnt mean he choose that some
    Then god will be blaming men for something god ordained. How can god get mad at men for not using there talents when you foreordained him not to use them

    It would make more sense to say god just passively allows it instead of actively allowing it.

    • November 8, 2016 at 12:27 pm


      You obviously didn’t read the article. Please read it and note that I mentioned three senses in which “foreknowledge” can be used. The sense in which you seem to be using the term is of God’s omniscience of things [actions and events] future and God clearly possesses such knowledge. That omniscience is universal and exhaustive. That is to say it extends to all his creatures and all their actions. If you apply that sense to Rom. 8:29, it would mean that, since his omniscience is universal, he has predestined every individual [believers and unbelievers] to be comformed to the image of his Son and that would utterly destroy Paul’s argument in that entire passage.

      As much as you and yours would like it to do so, verse twenty-nine does not state that God foresaw who would believe and persevere and decided to choose them on that basis. Foreknowledge, in the sense of its usage in that verse is not something God has but something he has done. The word “foreknew” is a verb and its object is people “whom” or “those.” He foreknew people, not what those people were going to do. If God’s choice of people had been based on what he foresaw, he wouldn’t have chosen to save anyone [See Psa. 14:1-3].

      Throughout your comment you have imputed to me a belief that I do not hold, namely, the idea that God actively causes everything he predestines. If you are going to comment on this blog, at least make some effort to understand what we believe. What I clearly don’t believe is that God passively allows anything to occur without having purposed it or without controlling it for the good of his chosen people. You need to deal exegetically with verses like Eph. 1:11 and Rom. 9:19.

      • November 8, 2016 at 2:32 pm

        Sometimes the word know can be used in a active sense where god is choosing it as Romans 8:29 is constructed since god is speaking to particular people because before the verse it mentions the saints.Romans 8:28.
        U said how can god know something without choosing it. A better question would be why does god have to be activebin everything. Just because god passively allows something to happen and stamps it doesnt diminish his sovereignty.

        If you see a earthquake that destroys a city or a gang that murder an innocent soul. You are forced to say that god preordained it. Would that make god the author of sin.

        Or would it be more sensible to say god passively/permitted to happen based off perfect knowledge but does not choose.

      • November 8, 2016 at 11:20 pm

        Your conclusions would only be correct if to predestine an event required God to cause the event. That is not our position.

  4. November 8, 2016 at 2:40 pm

    Foreknew people god entering a special relationship with them Romans 8:29 uses the words predestine and Foreknowledge in the same fragment.
    So yes usually when foreknew is speaking to individuals in particular
    It is constructed as a particular purpose for them. Im talking about when Foreknowledge is used generally not particularly.
    1 peter 1:2 clearly states that. The verse just says according to gods Foreknowledge. Passive Foreknowledge would not make him less sovereign then if he was actively doing it.
    If we put too much on the former we are equipped to say that god is not in complete control and doesnt have the control to do what he please.
    If we overemphasize the latter. Like some Calvinist do. you will be basically saying that god is the author of all our disobedience and transgressions.
    Active and passive can coexist
    Matthew 19

  5. November 8, 2016 at 11:13 pm

    Read my article “A Deterministic God.”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: